| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
collin
Joined: 07 Apr 2006 Posts: 15 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:58 am Post subject: Thumbnail quality |
|
|
I have just being trying IView MediaPro - not a bad program actually. It's best feature is its crystal clear thumbnails, they are clearly superior to Picajets for the same size
Apart from that Picajet is the superior program in just about every other area
However if there is one thing I would like to see improved in Picajet it is thumbnail quality. Alex is this likely to happen anytime soon  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kalain
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I would like also add the possibility to choose size thumbnail stored in database. (100,150,200,250,300 pix)
This is quite important when you do not have any more original in your computer. (Original are stored in DVD, .....)
By now, if you do not have any more original photo on your computer, thumbnails stored size is not enough to work with it.
Best regards
Alain PIERRE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex PicaJet Team
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 340
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I can suggest you to change resample filter for thumbnails to "Lanczos". You may found this parameter in options. Tools > Options > Import. "Generated thumbnails using resample filter" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
collinro
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I have tried Lanczos. It makes a slight difference to the quality but not much. Still not nearly as clear as the IView thumbnails. Maybe Kalain's suggestion is best and that larger thumbnails stored in the database would improve quality? Any other suggestions Alex? As thumbnails are the most common view it would make Picajet look a lot better if these were clearer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex PicaJet Team
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 340
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I shall look, that it is possible to make. But I think it will decrease performance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex PicaJet Team
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 340
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Actually PicaJet stores thumbnails with maximum size 256X256. So thumbnails with 300 displays with resample. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
collin
Joined: 07 Apr 2006 Posts: 15 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| With iView you can choose what thumbnail size you would like and they also give you a choice of low, medium or high quality. Their maximum thumbnail size is 640 pixels. They do warn that the use of large high-quality thumbnails will increase database size. I would certainly like the option to increase the thumbnail size as picture quality while browsing thumbnails is very important to me. Alex, could I suggest that you try their trial program (http://www.iview-multimedia.com/downloads/index.php?p=a) just so that you can see the difference? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex PicaJet Team
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 340
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks.
We developed database accordingly to inscrease performance and decrease size. Also using 3D engine has some specific peculiarities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex PicaJet Team
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 340
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
collin
Joined: 07 Apr 2006 Posts: 15 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks for that Alex, definately an improvement on previous thumbnail quality though still not anything like the clarity of IViews thumbnails. I am not sure how they do it. Anyhow thanks for the quick response to improving them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kalain
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
PJ 2.5 466
| Quote: | | Actually PicaJet stores thumbnails with maximum size 256X256. So thumbnails with 300 displays with resample. |
Are sure of that ?
Have a look at image below.
Display is set at 250px.
Left original image is not anymore available. If thumbnail is stored at 256*256 px in database, this thumbnail should be better quality than this (look also at Exif date : 1899. )
Right original image is available and thumnail is ok.
Another point, when you scroll up or down, it takes some time to refresh and reconstruct images thumbnails. I guess this is because thumbnails are extracted from original and not provided by data base which should be faster ?
Best regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kalain
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
Here is below same image (180*256 px) cropped while displayed at 100%
This looks much better than supposed 256px thumbnail ?
Best regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|